Witnessing another person’s suffering elicits vicarious brain activity in areas that are active when we ourselves are in pain. Whether this activity influences prosocial behavior remains the subject of debate. Here participants witnessed a confederate express pain through a reaction of the swatted hand or through a facial expression, and could decide to reduce that pain by donating money. Participants donate more money on trials in which the confederate expressed more pain. Electroencephalography shows that activity of the somatosensory cortex I (SI) hand region explains variance in donation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) shows that altering this activity interferes with the pain–donation coupling only when pain is expressed by the hand. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) shows that altering SI activity also interferes with pain perception. These experiments show that vicarious somatosensory activations contribute to prosocial decision-making and suggest that they do so by helping to transform observed reactions of affected body-parts into accurate perceptions of pain that are necessary for decision-making.

The causal role of the somatosensory cortex in prosocial behaviour / Gallo, Selene; Paracampo, Riccardo; Müller-Pinzler, Laura; Severo, Mario Carlo; Blömer, Laila; Fernandes-Henriques, Carolina; Henschel, Anna; Lammes, Balint Kalista; Maskaljunas, Tatjana; Suttrup, Judith; Avenanti, Alessio; Keysers, Christian; Gazzola, Valeria. - In: ELIFE. - ISSN 2050-084X. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:(2018), pp. e32740.1-e32740.31. [10.7554/eLife.32740]

The causal role of the somatosensory cortex in prosocial behaviour

Paracampo, Riccardo;Avenanti, Alessio;
2018

Abstract

Witnessing another person’s suffering elicits vicarious brain activity in areas that are active when we ourselves are in pain. Whether this activity influences prosocial behavior remains the subject of debate. Here participants witnessed a confederate express pain through a reaction of the swatted hand or through a facial expression, and could decide to reduce that pain by donating money. Participants donate more money on trials in which the confederate expressed more pain. Electroencephalography shows that activity of the somatosensory cortex I (SI) hand region explains variance in donation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) shows that altering this activity interferes with the pain–donation coupling only when pain is expressed by the hand. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) shows that altering SI activity also interferes with pain perception. These experiments show that vicarious somatosensory activations contribute to prosocial decision-making and suggest that they do so by helping to transform observed reactions of affected body-parts into accurate perceptions of pain that are necessary for decision-making.
2018
The causal role of the somatosensory cortex in prosocial behaviour / Gallo, Selene; Paracampo, Riccardo; Müller-Pinzler, Laura; Severo, Mario Carlo; Blömer, Laila; Fernandes-Henriques, Carolina; Henschel, Anna; Lammes, Balint Kalista; Maskaljunas, Tatjana; Suttrup, Judith; Avenanti, Alessio; Keysers, Christian; Gazzola, Valeria. - In: ELIFE. - ISSN 2050-084X. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:(2018), pp. e32740.1-e32740.31. [10.7554/eLife.32740]
Gallo, Selene; Paracampo, Riccardo; Müller-Pinzler, Laura; Severo, Mario Carlo; Blömer, Laila; Fernandes-Henriques, Carolina; Henschel, Anna; Lammes, Balint Kalista; Maskaljunas, Tatjana; Suttrup, Judith; Avenanti, Alessio; Keysers, Christian; Gazzola, Valeria
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gallo_2018eLife_maintext.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Gallo et al. 2018 eLife - main text + appendix
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 2.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.14 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/654891
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 28
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact