Ptolemy the Son has been much studied in the past. The problem of his identity has been considered as the most important aspect to investigate. This is true, but this article tries to focus more on another aspect which has been neglected: if there was a true coregency between Ptolemy II and the Son or what kind of coregency was, in comparison with other cases of the Diadochi and Epigones time. This is possible through a new exam of the main evidences (for example I. Milet 139) and the updating of its chronology, thanks to P. Sorb 3, 71.

Ptolemy the Son: a Pretended Co-regency ?

Lucia Criscuolo
2017

Abstract

Ptolemy the Son has been much studied in the past. The problem of his identity has been considered as the most important aspect to investigate. This is true, but this article tries to focus more on another aspect which has been neglected: if there was a true coregency between Ptolemy II and the Son or what kind of coregency was, in comparison with other cases of the Diadochi and Epigones time. This is possible through a new exam of the main evidences (for example I. Milet 139) and the updating of its chronology, thanks to P. Sorb 3, 71.
2017
Criscuolo, Lucia
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/619195
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact