The paper argues against what I call the "Fregean interpretation" of Peirce's distinction between the immediate and the dynamic object of a sign, according to which Peirce's dynamic object is akin to Frege's Bedeutung, while Peirce's immediate object is akin to Frege's Sinn. After having exposed the Fregean interpretation, I briefly reconstruct the genesis of Peirce's notion of immediate object in his semiotic writings of the years 1904-1909 and defend the view that, according to Peirce, only propositions have immediate objects.
Exploring Peirce's Speculative Grammar: The Immediate Object of a Sign / Bellucci, Francesco. - In: SIGN SYSTEMS STUDIES. - ISSN 1406-4243. - ELETTRONICO. - 43:4(2015), pp. 399-415. [10.12697/SSS.2015.43.4.02]
Exploring Peirce's Speculative Grammar: The Immediate Object of a Sign
BELLUCCI, FRANCESCO
2015
Abstract
The paper argues against what I call the "Fregean interpretation" of Peirce's distinction between the immediate and the dynamic object of a sign, according to which Peirce's dynamic object is akin to Frege's Bedeutung, while Peirce's immediate object is akin to Frege's Sinn. After having exposed the Fregean interpretation, I briefly reconstruct the genesis of Peirce's notion of immediate object in his semiotic writings of the years 1904-1909 and defend the view that, according to Peirce, only propositions have immediate objects.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione
217.57 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
217.57 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.