In the article the anthropological aspects of the heritage of Russian symbolists is considered through the solution of two tasks: first, the clarification of relationship among the elements of the ontological triad «World – Human being – God», and, secondly, the identification of ideal type of the human being. The Russian symbolism tried to harmonize both theocentric and anthropocentric variants of ontologies of culture in the its doctrine on human being. For the vast majority of symbolists Christ was an anthropological ideal, however Blok denies the strategy of identification with Christ and looks for a fulcrum in himself. The lyric poet is a personal anthropological ideal of Blok. Ivanov and Belyj see the anthropological future in fusion of the elements of the ontological triad. The agent of such transformation for Belyj is personal consciousness, and for Ivanov – bodily emancipation and openness of heart. Solving a problem of harmonization of the individual and collective, Ivanov and Belyj are based on opposite intentions. Ivanov is guided on «dissolution» of personal Self in others in his concept of Pananthropos. The Self-conscious Theurge of Belyj is a subject who has been focused on the perception of others as variants of the unique himself. Blok remains the individualist, being convinced that loneliness, not belonging to a group, allows the artist to fulfill his purpose. In our opinion, among three anthropological models under consideration, i.e. the Pananthropos, the Self-conscious Theurge and the Artist, only the last one can be carried out really within human life.

Čelovek kak ontologičeskaja problema v russkom simvolizme.

MASLOV, GLEB
2017

Abstract

In the article the anthropological aspects of the heritage of Russian symbolists is considered through the solution of two tasks: first, the clarification of relationship among the elements of the ontological triad «World – Human being – God», and, secondly, the identification of ideal type of the human being. The Russian symbolism tried to harmonize both theocentric and anthropocentric variants of ontologies of culture in the its doctrine on human being. For the vast majority of symbolists Christ was an anthropological ideal, however Blok denies the strategy of identification with Christ and looks for a fulcrum in himself. The lyric poet is a personal anthropological ideal of Blok. Ivanov and Belyj see the anthropological future in fusion of the elements of the ontological triad. The agent of such transformation for Belyj is personal consciousness, and for Ivanov – bodily emancipation and openness of heart. Solving a problem of harmonization of the individual and collective, Ivanov and Belyj are based on opposite intentions. Ivanov is guided on «dissolution» of personal Self in others in his concept of Pananthropos. The Self-conscious Theurge of Belyj is a subject who has been focused on the perception of others as variants of the unique himself. Blok remains the individualist, being convinced that loneliness, not belonging to a group, allows the artist to fulfill his purpose. In our opinion, among three anthropological models under consideration, i.e. the Pananthropos, the Self-conscious Theurge and the Artist, only the last one can be carried out really within human life.
2017
STUDIA SLAVICA
32
43
Maslov, Gleb
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/596718
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact