Despite the fact that metanalyses and clinical guidelines do not recommend the routine use of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients diagnosed with severe stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and with chronic respiratory failure, it is common practice in some countries. We conducted an international web-survey of physicians involved in provision of long-term NIV to examine patterns of domiciliary NIV use in patients diagnosed with COPD. The response rate was 41.6%. A reduction of hospital admissions, improvements in quality of life and dyspnea relief were considered as the main expected benefits for patients. Nocturnal oxygen saturation assessment was the principal procedure performed before NIV prescription. Recurrent exacerbations (>3) requiring NIV and failed weaning from in hospital NIV were the most important reasons for starting domiciliary NIV. Pressure support ventilation (PSV) was the most common mode, with “low” intensity settings (PSV-low) the most popular (44.4 ± 30.1%) compared with “high” intensity (PSV-high) strategies (26.9 ± 25.9%), with different geographical preferences. COPD is confirmed to be a common indication for domiciliary NIV. Recurrent exacerbations and failed weaning from in-hospital NIV were the main reasons for its prescription.

Domiciliary Non-invasive Ventilation in COPD: An International Survey of Indications and Practices / Crimi, Claudia; Noto, Alberto; Princi, Pietro; Cuvelier, Antoine; Masa, Juan F.; Simonds, Anita; Elliott, Mark W.; Wijkstra, Peter; Windisch, Wolfram; Nava, Stefano. - In: COPD. - ISSN 1541-2555. - STAMPA. - 13:4(2016), pp. 483-490. [10.3109/15412555.2015.1108960]

Domiciliary Non-invasive Ventilation in COPD: An International Survey of Indications and Practices

NAVA, STEFANO
2016

Abstract

Despite the fact that metanalyses and clinical guidelines do not recommend the routine use of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients diagnosed with severe stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and with chronic respiratory failure, it is common practice in some countries. We conducted an international web-survey of physicians involved in provision of long-term NIV to examine patterns of domiciliary NIV use in patients diagnosed with COPD. The response rate was 41.6%. A reduction of hospital admissions, improvements in quality of life and dyspnea relief were considered as the main expected benefits for patients. Nocturnal oxygen saturation assessment was the principal procedure performed before NIV prescription. Recurrent exacerbations (>3) requiring NIV and failed weaning from in hospital NIV were the most important reasons for starting domiciliary NIV. Pressure support ventilation (PSV) was the most common mode, with “low” intensity settings (PSV-low) the most popular (44.4 ± 30.1%) compared with “high” intensity (PSV-high) strategies (26.9 ± 25.9%), with different geographical preferences. COPD is confirmed to be a common indication for domiciliary NIV. Recurrent exacerbations and failed weaning from in-hospital NIV were the main reasons for its prescription.
2016
Domiciliary Non-invasive Ventilation in COPD: An International Survey of Indications and Practices / Crimi, Claudia; Noto, Alberto; Princi, Pietro; Cuvelier, Antoine; Masa, Juan F.; Simonds, Anita; Elliott, Mark W.; Wijkstra, Peter; Windisch, Wolfram; Nava, Stefano. - In: COPD. - ISSN 1541-2555. - STAMPA. - 13:4(2016), pp. 483-490. [10.3109/15412555.2015.1108960]
Crimi, Claudia; Noto, Alberto; Princi, Pietro; Cuvelier, Antoine; Masa, Juan F.; Simonds, Anita; Elliott, Mark W.; Wijkstra, Peter; Windisch, Wolfram; Nava, Stefano
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/585484
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 24
  • Scopus 70
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact