We revisit the two-stage duopoly game with strategic delegation and asymmetric technologies of Sen and Stamatopoulos (2015). We show that their conclusions are driven by the restrictive assumption that the extent of delegation to managers is confined to a binary set. Allowing for a continuous set of delegation incentives, we prove that the delegation stage is a prisoners’ dilemma, the unique subgame perfect equilibrium entailing both firms hiring managers. At equilibrium, the more efficient firm makes higher profits.

Strategic delegation under cost asymmetry

DELBONO, FLAVIO;LAMBERTINI, LUCA;MARATTIN, LUIGI
2016

Abstract

We revisit the two-stage duopoly game with strategic delegation and asymmetric technologies of Sen and Stamatopoulos (2015). We show that their conclusions are driven by the restrictive assumption that the extent of delegation to managers is confined to a binary set. Allowing for a continuous set of delegation incentives, we prove that the delegation stage is a prisoners’ dilemma, the unique subgame perfect equilibrium entailing both firms hiring managers. At equilibrium, the more efficient firm makes higher profits.
2016
Flavio Delbono; Luca Lambertini; Luigi Marattin
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Strategic delegation under cost preprint.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Preprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 197.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
197.9 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/567622
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact