The aim of the paper is to analyze, from an Ockhamian perspective, some relevant theories in the contemporary philosophy of religion. Alvin Plantinga’s Ockhamism is the crucial topic in this reading. We have noted some misunderstandings in the use of Ockhamian concepts and theories about topics such as theological fatalism and God’s foreknowledge. These problems show how Ockham’s point of view is, to this day, the best way to conceive of a compatibilist relation between the freedom of human will and the divine foreknowledge

Logic of belief: an ockhamian point of view / Riccardo Fedriga; Roberto Limonta. - In: PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRIES. - ISSN 2281-8618. - ELETTRONICO. - 2-2016:(2016), pp. 53-68.

Logic of belief: an ockhamian point of view

FEDRIGA, RICCARDO;
2016

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to analyze, from an Ockhamian perspective, some relevant theories in the contemporary philosophy of religion. Alvin Plantinga’s Ockhamism is the crucial topic in this reading. We have noted some misunderstandings in the use of Ockhamian concepts and theories about topics such as theological fatalism and God’s foreknowledge. These problems show how Ockham’s point of view is, to this day, the best way to conceive of a compatibilist relation between the freedom of human will and the divine foreknowledge
2016
Logic of belief: an ockhamian point of view / Riccardo Fedriga; Roberto Limonta. - In: PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRIES. - ISSN 2281-8618. - ELETTRONICO. - 2-2016:(2016), pp. 53-68.
Riccardo Fedriga; Roberto Limonta
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/566929
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact