Italy, like every country member of the European Union (EU), will have to achieve the objectives required by the Energy Roadmap 2050. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the environmental impacts of residue recovery arising from the management of public and private green feedstocks, activity of the cooperative “Green City” in the Bologna district, and usage in a centralized heating system to produce thermal energy for public buildings. Results, obtained using the ReCipe impact assessment method, are compared with scores achieved by a traditional methane boiler. The study shows some advantages of the biomass-based system in terms of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions and consumption of non-renewable fuels, which affect climate change (-41%) and fossil resources depletion (-40%), compared to the use of natural gas (NG). Moreover, scores from network analysis denote the great contribution of feedstock transportation (98% of the cumulative impact). The main reason is attributable to all requirements to cover distances, in particular due to stages involved in the fuel supply chains. Therefore, it is clear that greater environmental benefits could be achieved by reducing supply transport distances or using more sustainable engines.

Biomass Residues to Renewable Energy: A Life Cycle Perspective Applied at a Local Scale / Neri, Esmeralda; Cespi, Daniele; Setti, Leonardo; Gombi, Erica; Bernardi, Elena; Vassura, Ivano; Passarini, Fabrizio. - In: ENERGIES. - ISSN 1996-1073. - ELETTRONICO. - 9:11(2016), pp. 922-936. [10.3390/en9110922]

Biomass Residues to Renewable Energy: A Life Cycle Perspective Applied at a Local Scale

NERI, ESMERALDA;CESPI, DANIELE;SETTI, LEONARDO;BERNARDI, ELENA;VASSURA, IVANO;PASSARINI, FABRIZIO
2016

Abstract

Italy, like every country member of the European Union (EU), will have to achieve the objectives required by the Energy Roadmap 2050. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the environmental impacts of residue recovery arising from the management of public and private green feedstocks, activity of the cooperative “Green City” in the Bologna district, and usage in a centralized heating system to produce thermal energy for public buildings. Results, obtained using the ReCipe impact assessment method, are compared with scores achieved by a traditional methane boiler. The study shows some advantages of the biomass-based system in terms of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions and consumption of non-renewable fuels, which affect climate change (-41%) and fossil resources depletion (-40%), compared to the use of natural gas (NG). Moreover, scores from network analysis denote the great contribution of feedstock transportation (98% of the cumulative impact). The main reason is attributable to all requirements to cover distances, in particular due to stages involved in the fuel supply chains. Therefore, it is clear that greater environmental benefits could be achieved by reducing supply transport distances or using more sustainable engines.
2016
Biomass Residues to Renewable Energy: A Life Cycle Perspective Applied at a Local Scale / Neri, Esmeralda; Cespi, Daniele; Setti, Leonardo; Gombi, Erica; Bernardi, Elena; Vassura, Ivano; Passarini, Fabrizio. - In: ENERGIES. - ISSN 1996-1073. - ELETTRONICO. - 9:11(2016), pp. 922-936. [10.3390/en9110922]
Neri, Esmeralda; Cespi, Daniele; Setti, Leonardo; Gombi, Erica; Bernardi, Elena; Vassura, Ivano; Passarini, Fabrizio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Biomass Residues to Renewable Energy A Life Cycle Perspective Applied at a Local Scale_Energies.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 950.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
950.52 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/566897
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
social impact