Introduction Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions have raised concern for both huge increase of health expenditure and possible long-term adverse effects. Objective To evaluate appropriateness of PPI prescription in ambulatory and hospital care. Design Observational cohort study. Patients Patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Unit of Bologna S. Orsola Hospital between 15/09/2013 and 15/12/2013. Data on clinical condition and drug therapy were collected at three time points: admission (reflecting GP's prescription), hospital stay and discharge. Main measures Appropriateness of PPI use was evaluated as follows: (1) agreement between PPI use/non-use and appropriate clinical condition; (2) in PPI users, assessment of Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Differences in appropriateness among time points were analyzed by chi-square test. Logistic regression model was used to identify possible determinants of PPI appropriateness. Key results Among 280 patients, 56% received PPI at least once in the three time points. Appropriateness, according to indication of use, was similar between admission and hospital stay (61% vs. 62%; p = 0.82) and between hospital stay and discharge (62% vs. 59%; p = 0.94). MAI score showed important, although statistically non-significant, change in appropriateness between admission and hospital stay (20% vs. 28%; p = 0.16). Age ≥ 65 was always associated with appropriate PPI use (up to OR = 4.37; p < 0.01), whereas cardiovascular comorbidity and conditions requiring analgesic treatment influenced appropriateness only at admission (OR = 3.84; p < 0.01 and OR = 0.34; p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions Hospital clinicians only rarely reconsidered GP's choice to prescribe PPI. Room for improvement in PPI appropriateness is represented by (1) assessing gastrointestinal risk in each patient under analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs, and (2) short-term re-evaluation of PPI prescription after discharge.

Appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) prescription in patients admitted to hospital: Attitudes of general practitioners and hospital physicians in Italy / Lodato, Francesca; Poluzzi, Elisabetta; Raschi, Emanuel; Piccinni, Carlo; Koci, Ariola; Olivelli, Valentina; Napoli, Chiara; Corvalli, Giulia; Nalon, Elena; De Ponti, Fabrizio; Zoli, Marco. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 0953-6205. - STAMPA. - 30:(2016), pp. 31-36. [10.1016/j.ejim.2016.01.025]

Appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) prescription in patients admitted to hospital: Attitudes of general practitioners and hospital physicians in Italy

LODATO, FRANCESCA;POLUZZI, ELISABETTA;RASCHI, EMANUEL;PICCINNI, CARLO;KOCI, ARIOLA;OLIVELLI, VALENTINA;NAPOLI, CHIARA;CORVALLI, GIULIA;NALON, ELENA;DE PONTI, FABRIZIO;ZOLI, MARCO
2016

Abstract

Introduction Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions have raised concern for both huge increase of health expenditure and possible long-term adverse effects. Objective To evaluate appropriateness of PPI prescription in ambulatory and hospital care. Design Observational cohort study. Patients Patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Unit of Bologna S. Orsola Hospital between 15/09/2013 and 15/12/2013. Data on clinical condition and drug therapy were collected at three time points: admission (reflecting GP's prescription), hospital stay and discharge. Main measures Appropriateness of PPI use was evaluated as follows: (1) agreement between PPI use/non-use and appropriate clinical condition; (2) in PPI users, assessment of Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Differences in appropriateness among time points were analyzed by chi-square test. Logistic regression model was used to identify possible determinants of PPI appropriateness. Key results Among 280 patients, 56% received PPI at least once in the three time points. Appropriateness, according to indication of use, was similar between admission and hospital stay (61% vs. 62%; p = 0.82) and between hospital stay and discharge (62% vs. 59%; p = 0.94). MAI score showed important, although statistically non-significant, change in appropriateness between admission and hospital stay (20% vs. 28%; p = 0.16). Age ≥ 65 was always associated with appropriate PPI use (up to OR = 4.37; p < 0.01), whereas cardiovascular comorbidity and conditions requiring analgesic treatment influenced appropriateness only at admission (OR = 3.84; p < 0.01 and OR = 0.34; p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions Hospital clinicians only rarely reconsidered GP's choice to prescribe PPI. Room for improvement in PPI appropriateness is represented by (1) assessing gastrointestinal risk in each patient under analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs, and (2) short-term re-evaluation of PPI prescription after discharge.
2016
Appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) prescription in patients admitted to hospital: Attitudes of general practitioners and hospital physicians in Italy / Lodato, Francesca; Poluzzi, Elisabetta; Raschi, Emanuel; Piccinni, Carlo; Koci, Ariola; Olivelli, Valentina; Napoli, Chiara; Corvalli, Giulia; Nalon, Elena; De Ponti, Fabrizio; Zoli, Marco. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 0953-6205. - STAMPA. - 30:(2016), pp. 31-36. [10.1016/j.ejim.2016.01.025]
Lodato, Francesca; Poluzzi, Elisabetta; Raschi, Emanuel; Piccinni, Carlo; Koci, Ariola; Olivelli, Valentina; Napoli, Chiara; Corvalli, Giulia; Nalon, Elena; De Ponti, Fabrizio; Zoli, Marco
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/560855
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact