Background Sensitization to profilins and other cross-reacting molecules might hinder proper specific immunotherapy (SIT) prescription in polysensitized patients with pollen-related allergic rhinitis (AR). In these patients, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) might modify SIT prescription by improving the identification of the disease-eliciting pollen sources. Objectives We sought to measure the effect of CRD on SIT prescription in children with pollen-related AR. Methods Children (n = 651) with moderate-to-severe pollen-related AR were recruited between May 2009 and June 2011 in 16 Italian outpatient clinics. Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to grass, cypress, olive, mugwort, pellitory, and/or Betulaceae pollen was considered clinically relevant if symptoms occurred during the corresponding peak pollen season. IgE sensitization to Phl p 1, Phl p 5, Bet v 1, Cup a 1, Art v 1, Ole e 1, Par j 2, and Phl p 12 (profilin) was measured by using ImmunoCAP. SIT prescription was modeled on SPT responses first and then remodeled considering also CRD according to GA2LEN-European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology guidelines and the opinions of 14 pediatric allergists. Results No IgE to the respective major allergens was detected in significant proportions of patients with supposed clinically relevant sensitization to mugwort (45/65 [69%]), Betulaceae (146/252 [60%]), pellitory (78/257 [30%]), olive (111/390 [28%]), cypress (28/184 [15%]), and grass (56/568 [10%]). IgE to profilins, polcalcins, or both could justify 173 (37%) of 464 of these SPT reactions. After CRD, the SPT-based decision on SIT prescription or composition was changed in 277 (42%) of 651 or 315 (48%) of 651 children according to the European or American approach, respectively, and in 305 (47%) of 651 children according to the opinion of the 14 local pediatric allergists. Conclusions In children with pollen-related AR, applying CRD leads to changes in a large proportion of SIT prescriptions as opposed to relying on clinical history and SPT alone. The hypothesis that CRD-guided prescription improves SIT efficacy deserves to be tested. © 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.

The effect of component-resolved diagnosis on specific immunotherapy prescription in children with hay fever / Stringari, Giovanna; Tripodi, Salvatore; Caffarelli, Carlo; Dondi, Arianna; Asero, Riccardo; Di Rienzo Businco, Andrea; Bianchi, Annamaria; Candelotti, Paolo; Ricci, Giampaolo; Bellini, Federica; Maiello, Nunzia; Miraglia Del Giudice, Michele; Frediani, Tullio; Sodano, Simona; Dello Iacono, Iride; Macrì, Francesco; Peparini, Ilaria; Povesi Dascola, Carlotta; Patria, Maria Francesca; Varin, Elena; Peroni, Diego; Comberiati, Pasquale; Chini, Loredana; Moschese, Viviana; Lucarelli, Sandra; Bernardini, Roberto; Pingitore, Giuseppe; Pelosi, Umberto; Tosca, Mariangela; Cirisano, Anastasia; Faggian, Diego; Travaglini, Alessandro; Plebani, Mario; Matricardi, Paolo Maria. - In: JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. - ISSN 0091-6749. - ELETTRONICO. - 134:1(2014), pp. 75-81.e2. [10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.042]

The effect of component-resolved diagnosis on specific immunotherapy prescription in children with hay fever

DONDI, ARIANNA;RICCI, GIAMPAOLO;BELLINI, FEDERICA;
2014

Abstract

Background Sensitization to profilins and other cross-reacting molecules might hinder proper specific immunotherapy (SIT) prescription in polysensitized patients with pollen-related allergic rhinitis (AR). In these patients, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) might modify SIT prescription by improving the identification of the disease-eliciting pollen sources. Objectives We sought to measure the effect of CRD on SIT prescription in children with pollen-related AR. Methods Children (n = 651) with moderate-to-severe pollen-related AR were recruited between May 2009 and June 2011 in 16 Italian outpatient clinics. Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to grass, cypress, olive, mugwort, pellitory, and/or Betulaceae pollen was considered clinically relevant if symptoms occurred during the corresponding peak pollen season. IgE sensitization to Phl p 1, Phl p 5, Bet v 1, Cup a 1, Art v 1, Ole e 1, Par j 2, and Phl p 12 (profilin) was measured by using ImmunoCAP. SIT prescription was modeled on SPT responses first and then remodeled considering also CRD according to GA2LEN-European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology guidelines and the opinions of 14 pediatric allergists. Results No IgE to the respective major allergens was detected in significant proportions of patients with supposed clinically relevant sensitization to mugwort (45/65 [69%]), Betulaceae (146/252 [60%]), pellitory (78/257 [30%]), olive (111/390 [28%]), cypress (28/184 [15%]), and grass (56/568 [10%]). IgE to profilins, polcalcins, or both could justify 173 (37%) of 464 of these SPT reactions. After CRD, the SPT-based decision on SIT prescription or composition was changed in 277 (42%) of 651 or 315 (48%) of 651 children according to the European or American approach, respectively, and in 305 (47%) of 651 children according to the opinion of the 14 local pediatric allergists. Conclusions In children with pollen-related AR, applying CRD leads to changes in a large proportion of SIT prescriptions as opposed to relying on clinical history and SPT alone. The hypothesis that CRD-guided prescription improves SIT efficacy deserves to be tested. © 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.
2014
The effect of component-resolved diagnosis on specific immunotherapy prescription in children with hay fever / Stringari, Giovanna; Tripodi, Salvatore; Caffarelli, Carlo; Dondi, Arianna; Asero, Riccardo; Di Rienzo Businco, Andrea; Bianchi, Annamaria; Candelotti, Paolo; Ricci, Giampaolo; Bellini, Federica; Maiello, Nunzia; Miraglia Del Giudice, Michele; Frediani, Tullio; Sodano, Simona; Dello Iacono, Iride; Macrì, Francesco; Peparini, Ilaria; Povesi Dascola, Carlotta; Patria, Maria Francesca; Varin, Elena; Peroni, Diego; Comberiati, Pasquale; Chini, Loredana; Moschese, Viviana; Lucarelli, Sandra; Bernardini, Roberto; Pingitore, Giuseppe; Pelosi, Umberto; Tosca, Mariangela; Cirisano, Anastasia; Faggian, Diego; Travaglini, Alessandro; Plebani, Mario; Matricardi, Paolo Maria. - In: JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. - ISSN 0091-6749. - ELETTRONICO. - 134:1(2014), pp. 75-81.e2. [10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.042]
Stringari, Giovanna; Tripodi, Salvatore; Caffarelli, Carlo; Dondi, Arianna; Asero, Riccardo; Di Rienzo Businco, Andrea; Bianchi, Annamaria; Candelotti, Paolo; Ricci, Giampaolo; Bellini, Federica; Maiello, Nunzia; Miraglia Del Giudice, Michele; Frediani, Tullio; Sodano, Simona; Dello Iacono, Iride; Macrì, Francesco; Peparini, Ilaria; Povesi Dascola, Carlotta; Patria, Maria Francesca; Varin, Elena; Peroni, Diego; Comberiati, Pasquale; Chini, Loredana; Moschese, Viviana; Lucarelli, Sandra; Bernardini, Roberto; Pingitore, Giuseppe; Pelosi, Umberto; Tosca, Mariangela; Cirisano, Anastasia; Faggian, Diego; Travaglini, Alessandro; Plebani, Mario; Matricardi, Paolo Maria
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/552194
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 37
  • Scopus 137
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 118
social impact