Purpose: To prospectively compare the rates of pathologic response, acute toxicity, and sphincter preservation with two different schedules of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT3 mid-distal rectal cancer. Methods and Materials: Patients with cT3 and/or N+ resectable rectal carcinoma were randomized to receive one of the two following chemoradiotherapy regimens: cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy (PLAFUR) or raltitrexed, oxaliplatin, and radiotherapy (TOMOX-RT). For PLAFUR, cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was given on Days 1 and 29, with a prolonged infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2) on Days 1-4 and 29-32, plus concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions daily). For TOMOX-RT, raltitrexed (3 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) was given on Days 1, 19, and 38 with the same radiotherapy regimen as used for PLAFUR. Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. All pathologic specimens were reviewed by a designated expert pathologist. The primary endpoint of this study was pathologic tumor downstaging (defined as tumor regression grade 1-2). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of ypT0, clinical tumor downstaging, sphincter-saving surgery, and acute treatment-related toxicity. Results: Between 2002 and 2005, 164 patients were accrued in 10 Italian centers, 83 patients in the PLAFUR arm and 81 in the TOMOX-RT arm. Overall, tumor regression grade 1-2 was observed in 76 patients (46.4%) and ypT0 in 49 (29.9%). The tumor regression grade 1-2 rate was 41.0% vs. 51.9% (p = 0.162) and the ypT0 rate was 24.1% vs. 35.8% (p = 0.102) for the PLAFUR vs. TOMOX-RT arm, respectively. The overall rate of tumor regression grade 1 and ypN+ was 4.6%. The occurrence of ypT downstaging was significantly greater in the TOMOX-RT arm (p = 0.035). Grade 3-4 acute toxicity occurred in 19 patients (11.6%): 7.1% in the PLAFUR arm vs. 16.4% in the TOMOX-RT arm. Sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 143 patients (87.2%) overall: 87.9% in the PLAFUR arm and 86.4% in the TOMOX-RT arm. Conclusions: Compared with the PLAFUR regimen, TOMOX-RT achieved a greater incidence of downstaging but was associated with a correspondingly greater rate of acute Grade 3+ toxicity. With longer follow-up, the local control and survival rates might offer additional guidance as to the choice of regimen. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIB Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in T3 Mid-Distal Rectal Cancer: Raltitrexed + Oxaliplatin + Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin + 5-Fluorouracil + Radiotherapy / Valentini, Vincenzo; Coco, Claudio; Minsky, Bruce D.; Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta; Cosimelli, Maurizio; Bellavita, Rita; Morganti, Alessio G.; La Torre, Giuseppe; Trodella, Lucio; Genovesi, Domenico; Portaluri, Maurizio; Maurizi-Enrici, Riccardo; Barbera, Fernando; Maranzano, Ernesto; Lupattelli, Marco. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS. - ISSN 0360-3016. - ELETTRONICO. - 70:2(2008), pp. 403-412. [10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.025]

Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIB Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in T3 Mid-Distal Rectal Cancer: Raltitrexed + Oxaliplatin + Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin + 5-Fluorouracil + Radiotherapy

MORGANTI, ALESSIO GIUSEPPE;
2008

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively compare the rates of pathologic response, acute toxicity, and sphincter preservation with two different schedules of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT3 mid-distal rectal cancer. Methods and Materials: Patients with cT3 and/or N+ resectable rectal carcinoma were randomized to receive one of the two following chemoradiotherapy regimens: cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy (PLAFUR) or raltitrexed, oxaliplatin, and radiotherapy (TOMOX-RT). For PLAFUR, cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was given on Days 1 and 29, with a prolonged infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2) on Days 1-4 and 29-32, plus concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions daily). For TOMOX-RT, raltitrexed (3 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) was given on Days 1, 19, and 38 with the same radiotherapy regimen as used for PLAFUR. Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. All pathologic specimens were reviewed by a designated expert pathologist. The primary endpoint of this study was pathologic tumor downstaging (defined as tumor regression grade 1-2). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of ypT0, clinical tumor downstaging, sphincter-saving surgery, and acute treatment-related toxicity. Results: Between 2002 and 2005, 164 patients were accrued in 10 Italian centers, 83 patients in the PLAFUR arm and 81 in the TOMOX-RT arm. Overall, tumor regression grade 1-2 was observed in 76 patients (46.4%) and ypT0 in 49 (29.9%). The tumor regression grade 1-2 rate was 41.0% vs. 51.9% (p = 0.162) and the ypT0 rate was 24.1% vs. 35.8% (p = 0.102) for the PLAFUR vs. TOMOX-RT arm, respectively. The overall rate of tumor regression grade 1 and ypN+ was 4.6%. The occurrence of ypT downstaging was significantly greater in the TOMOX-RT arm (p = 0.035). Grade 3-4 acute toxicity occurred in 19 patients (11.6%): 7.1% in the PLAFUR arm vs. 16.4% in the TOMOX-RT arm. Sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 143 patients (87.2%) overall: 87.9% in the PLAFUR arm and 86.4% in the TOMOX-RT arm. Conclusions: Compared with the PLAFUR regimen, TOMOX-RT achieved a greater incidence of downstaging but was associated with a correspondingly greater rate of acute Grade 3+ toxicity. With longer follow-up, the local control and survival rates might offer additional guidance as to the choice of regimen. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2008
Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIB Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in T3 Mid-Distal Rectal Cancer: Raltitrexed + Oxaliplatin + Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin + 5-Fluorouracil + Radiotherapy / Valentini, Vincenzo; Coco, Claudio; Minsky, Bruce D.; Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta; Cosimelli, Maurizio; Bellavita, Rita; Morganti, Alessio G.; La Torre, Giuseppe; Trodella, Lucio; Genovesi, Domenico; Portaluri, Maurizio; Maurizi-Enrici, Riccardo; Barbera, Fernando; Maranzano, Ernesto; Lupattelli, Marco. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS. - ISSN 0360-3016. - ELETTRONICO. - 70:2(2008), pp. 403-412. [10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.025]
Valentini, Vincenzo; Coco, Claudio; Minsky, Bruce D.; Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta; Cosimelli, Maurizio; Bellavita, Rita; Morganti, Alessio G.; La Torre, Giuseppe; Trodella, Lucio; Genovesi, Domenico; Portaluri, Maurizio; Maurizi-Enrici, Riccardo; Barbera, Fernando; Maranzano, Ernesto; Lupattelli, Marco
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/552107
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact