A quantitative comparison between discriminatory indexes and concordance among multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), automated ribotyping, and phage typing has been performed, testing 238 Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolates not epidemiologically correlated. The results show that MLVA is the best choice, but each typing method provides a piece of information for establishing clonal relationships between the isolates.
Comparison between Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis genotyping methods and phage type / De Cesare, A.; Krishnamani, K.; Parisi, A.; Ricci, A.; Luzzi, I.; Barco, L.; Lucchi, A.; Miccolupo, A.; Manfreda, G.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY. - ISSN 0095-1137. - STAMPA. - 53:9(2015), pp. 3021-3031. [10.1128/JCM.01122-15]
Comparison between Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis genotyping methods and phage type
DE CESARE, ALESSANDRA;LUCCHI, ALEX;MANFREDA, GERARDO
2015
Abstract
A quantitative comparison between discriminatory indexes and concordance among multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), automated ribotyping, and phage typing has been performed, testing 238 Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolates not epidemiologically correlated. The results show that MLVA is the best choice, but each typing method provides a piece of information for establishing clonal relationships between the isolates.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
