Purpose:A subset of patients with KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors show loss of function of succinate dehydrogenase, mostly due to germ-line mutations of succinate dehydrogenase subunits, with a predominance of succinate dehydrogenase subunit A. The clinical outcome of these patients seems favorable, as reported in small series in which patients were individually described. This work evaluates a retrospective survival analysis of a series of patients with metastatic KIT/PDGFRA wild-type succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Methods:Sixty-nine patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors were included in the study (11 KIT/PDGFRA wild-type, of whom 6 were succinate dehydrogenase deficient, 5 were non-succinate dehydrogenase deficient, and 58 were KIT/PDGFRA mutant). All six succinate dehydrogenase-deficient patients harbored SDHA mutations. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare the survival of patients with succinate dehydrogenase subunit A-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors with that of KIT/PDGFRA wild-type patients without succinate dehydrogenase deficiency and patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Results:Follow-up ranged from 8.5 to 200.7 months. The difference between succinate dehydrogenase subunit A-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors and KIT/PDGFRA-mutant or KIT/PDGFRA wild-type non-succinate dehydrogenase deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors was significant considering different analyses (P = 0.007 and P = 0.033, respectively, from diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor for the whole study population; P = 0.005 and P = 0.018, respectively, from diagnosis of metastatic disease for the whole study population; P = 0.007 for only patients who were metastatic at diagnosis).Conclusion:Patients with metastatic KIT/PDGFRA wild-type succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors harboring succinate dehydrogenase subunit A mutations present an impressively long survival. These patients should be identified in clinical practice to better tailor treatments and follow-up over time

A subset of patients with KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors show loss of function of succinate dehydrogenase, mostly due to germ-line mutations of succinate dehydrogenase subunits, with a predominance of succinate dehydrogenase subunit A. The clinical outcome of these patients seems favorable, as reported in small series in which patients were individually described. This work evaluates a retrospective survival analysis of a series of patients with metastatic KIT/PDGFRA wild-type succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Methods:Sixty-nine patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors were included in the study (11 KIT/PDGFRA wild-type, of whom 6 were succinate dehydrogenase deficient, 5 were non-succinate dehydrogenase deficient, and 58 were KIT/PDGFRA mutant). All six succinate dehydrogenase-deficient patients harbored SDHA mutations. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare the survival of patients with succinate dehydrogenase subunit A-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors with that of KIT/PDGFRA wild-type patients without succinate dehydrogenase deficiency and patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Results:Follow-up ranged from 8.5 to 200.7 months. The difference between succinate dehydrogenase subunit A-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors and KIT/PDGFRA-mutant or KIT/PDGFRA wild-type non-succinate dehydrogenase deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors was significant considering different analyses (P = 0.007 and P = 0.033, respectively, from diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor for the whole study population; P = 0.005 and P = 0.018, respectively, from diagnosis of metastatic disease for the whole study population; P = 0.007 for only patients who were metastatic at diagnosis).Conclusion:Patients with metastatic KIT/PDGFRA wild-type succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors harboring succinate dehydrogenase subunit A mutations present an impressively long survival. These patients should be identified in clinical practice to better tailor treatments and follow-up over time.

Good survival outcome of metastatic SDH-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors harboring SDHA mutations / Maria A. Pantaleo;Cristian Lolli;Margherita Nannini;Annalisa Astolfi;Valentina Indio;Maristella Saponara;Milena Urbini;Stefano La Rovere;Antony Gill;David Goldstein;Claudio Ceccarelli;Donatella Santini;Giulio Rossi;Michelangelo Fiorentino;Valerio Di Scioscio;Pietro Fusaroli;Anna Mandrioli;Lidia Gatto;Fausto Catena;Umberto Basso;Giorgio Ercolani;Antonio Daniele Pinna;Guido Biasco. - In: GENETICS IN MEDICINE. - ISSN 1098-3600. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:5(2015), pp. 391-395. [10.1038/gim.2014.115]

Good survival outcome of metastatic SDH-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors harboring SDHA mutations

PANTALEO, MARIA ABBONDANZA;LOLLI, CRISTIAN;NANNINI, MARGHERITA;ASTOLFI, ANNALISA;INDIO, VALENTINA;SAPONARA, MARISTELLA;URBINI, MILENA;CECCARELLI, CLAUDIO;SANTINI, DONATELLA;FIORENTINO, MICHELANGELO;DI SCIOSCIO, VALERIO;FUSAROLI, PIETRO;MANDRIOLI, ANNA;GATTO, LIDIA;CATENA, FAUSTO;ERCOLANI, GIORGIO;PINNA, ANTONIO DANIELE;BIASCO, GUIDO
2015

Abstract

A subset of patients with KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors show loss of function of succinate dehydrogenase, mostly due to germ-line mutations of succinate dehydrogenase subunits, with a predominance of succinate dehydrogenase subunit A. The clinical outcome of these patients seems favorable, as reported in small series in which patients were individually described. This work evaluates a retrospective survival analysis of a series of patients with metastatic KIT/PDGFRA wild-type succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Methods:Sixty-nine patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors were included in the study (11 KIT/PDGFRA wild-type, of whom 6 were succinate dehydrogenase deficient, 5 were non-succinate dehydrogenase deficient, and 58 were KIT/PDGFRA mutant). All six succinate dehydrogenase-deficient patients harbored SDHA mutations. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to compare the survival of patients with succinate dehydrogenase subunit A-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors with that of KIT/PDGFRA wild-type patients without succinate dehydrogenase deficiency and patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Results:Follow-up ranged from 8.5 to 200.7 months. The difference between succinate dehydrogenase subunit A-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors and KIT/PDGFRA-mutant or KIT/PDGFRA wild-type non-succinate dehydrogenase deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors was significant considering different analyses (P = 0.007 and P = 0.033, respectively, from diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor for the whole study population; P = 0.005 and P = 0.018, respectively, from diagnosis of metastatic disease for the whole study population; P = 0.007 for only patients who were metastatic at diagnosis).Conclusion:Patients with metastatic KIT/PDGFRA wild-type succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors harboring succinate dehydrogenase subunit A mutations present an impressively long survival. These patients should be identified in clinical practice to better tailor treatments and follow-up over time.
2015
Good survival outcome of metastatic SDH-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors harboring SDHA mutations / Maria A. Pantaleo;Cristian Lolli;Margherita Nannini;Annalisa Astolfi;Valentina Indio;Maristella Saponara;Milena Urbini;Stefano La Rovere;Antony Gill;David Goldstein;Claudio Ceccarelli;Donatella Santini;Giulio Rossi;Michelangelo Fiorentino;Valerio Di Scioscio;Pietro Fusaroli;Anna Mandrioli;Lidia Gatto;Fausto Catena;Umberto Basso;Giorgio Ercolani;Antonio Daniele Pinna;Guido Biasco. - In: GENETICS IN MEDICINE. - ISSN 1098-3600. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:5(2015), pp. 391-395. [10.1038/gim.2014.115]
Maria A. Pantaleo;Cristian Lolli;Margherita Nannini;Annalisa Astolfi;Valentina Indio;Maristella Saponara;Milena Urbini;Stefano La Rovere;Antony Gill;David Goldstein;Claudio Ceccarelli;Donatella Santini;Giulio Rossi;Michelangelo Fiorentino;Valerio Di Scioscio;Pietro Fusaroli;Anna Mandrioli;Lidia Gatto;Fausto Catena;Umberto Basso;Giorgio Ercolani;Antonio Daniele Pinna;Guido Biasco
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
gim2014115a.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo (CCBYNCSA)
Dimensione 886.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
886.01 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/353722
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact