The factors associated with persistent instability of oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) were investigated in a case-control study. The most unstable patients from 35 Italian anticoagulation clinics were matched with stable controls, for gender, age and OAT indication. Socio-demographic data, medical history, dietary and life habits, cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 variants, blood cell count, liver and renal functions were investigated. An 'Abbreviated Mental Test' (AMT) and a questionnaire to assess patient compliance to, and comprehension of, OAT indications and mechanisms were administered. An International Normalized Ratio (INR) above 4.5 was more frequently found in cases (n = 77) than controls (n = 80) (12.3% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.0001). The odds ratio for instability was significantly higher for: people who worked versus pensioners, acenocoumarol versus warfarin, and an insufficient score in the AMT and/or in the questionnaire. Cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 variants *1/*3 or *2/*3 or *3/*3 were more frequent among cases than controls (29.9% vs.15.0%; P = 0.042). No differences were observed as regards the other variables. In conclusion, we found that high intra-individual variability in OAT control was multifactorial, but poor OAT comprehension was prevalent.

Risks factors for highly unstable response to oral anticoagulation: a case-control study / Palareti G; Legnani C; Guazzaloca G; Lelia V; Cosmi B; Lunghi B; Marchetti G; Poli D; Pengo V; ad hoc Study Group of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0007-1048. - STAMPA. - 129:(2005), pp. 72-78. [10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05417.x]

Risks factors for highly unstable response to oral anticoagulation: a case-control study.

PALARETI, GUALTIERO;COSMI, BENILDE;
2005

Abstract

The factors associated with persistent instability of oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) were investigated in a case-control study. The most unstable patients from 35 Italian anticoagulation clinics were matched with stable controls, for gender, age and OAT indication. Socio-demographic data, medical history, dietary and life habits, cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 variants, blood cell count, liver and renal functions were investigated. An 'Abbreviated Mental Test' (AMT) and a questionnaire to assess patient compliance to, and comprehension of, OAT indications and mechanisms were administered. An International Normalized Ratio (INR) above 4.5 was more frequently found in cases (n = 77) than controls (n = 80) (12.3% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.0001). The odds ratio for instability was significantly higher for: people who worked versus pensioners, acenocoumarol versus warfarin, and an insufficient score in the AMT and/or in the questionnaire. Cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 variants *1/*3 or *2/*3 or *3/*3 were more frequent among cases than controls (29.9% vs.15.0%; P = 0.042). No differences were observed as regards the other variables. In conclusion, we found that high intra-individual variability in OAT control was multifactorial, but poor OAT comprehension was prevalent.
2005
Risks factors for highly unstable response to oral anticoagulation: a case-control study / Palareti G; Legnani C; Guazzaloca G; Lelia V; Cosmi B; Lunghi B; Marchetti G; Poli D; Pengo V; ad hoc Study Group of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0007-1048. - STAMPA. - 129:(2005), pp. 72-78. [10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05417.x]
Palareti G; Legnani C; Guazzaloca G; Lelia V; Cosmi B; Lunghi B; Marchetti G; Poli D; Pengo V; ad hoc Study Group of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/14289
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 89
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 78
social impact