A study was conducted to sensory traits of meat from chickens labelled free-range (according to the EC Directive 1538/91) if compared with conventional ones. Free range female and male chickens were separately raised for 56 and 70 d, respectively, in order to obtain currently marketed product categories (rotisserie and cut-up carcasses). They belonged to medium growing Isa strain and had continuous daytime access to open-air area from 28 d to slaughter age. Conventional female and male chickens belonged to a fast growing hybrid (Ross 708) and were separately raised for 39 and 50 d, respectively, under intensive conditions in a poultry house under controlled environmental conditions. After slaughtering, 20 carcasses for each group were randomly selected and used to conduct a triangle test (42 untrained panellists) and consumer test (54 untrained panellists) on both breast and leg meat. Triangle test evidenced that both breast and leg meat from free range birds had sensory properties (P<0.05) well recognizable in respect to control group. On the contrary, no significant general differences were observed in consumer test for tenderness, juiciness, flavour and overall acceptance, even if breast meat from free range rotisserie-type carcasses evidenced a greater acceptability. In conclusion, untrained panellists were able to recognize differences between free range and conventional chicken breast and leg meats, even if few variations in meat sensory traits were detected.

Sensory traits of meat from free range chickens / PETRACCI M.; RIMINI S.; FRANCHINI A.; CAVANI C.. - In: WORLD'S POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL. - ISSN 1743-4777. - ELETTRONICO. - 68:Suppl. 1(2012), pp. 22-26. (Intervento presentato al convegno World's Poultry Congress tenutosi a Salvador (Brazil) nel 5-9 August 2012).

Sensory traits of meat from free range chickens

PETRACCI, MASSIMILIANO;RIMINI, SIMONE;FRANCHINI, ACHILLE;CAVANI, CLAUDIO
2012

Abstract

A study was conducted to sensory traits of meat from chickens labelled free-range (according to the EC Directive 1538/91) if compared with conventional ones. Free range female and male chickens were separately raised for 56 and 70 d, respectively, in order to obtain currently marketed product categories (rotisserie and cut-up carcasses). They belonged to medium growing Isa strain and had continuous daytime access to open-air area from 28 d to slaughter age. Conventional female and male chickens belonged to a fast growing hybrid (Ross 708) and were separately raised for 39 and 50 d, respectively, under intensive conditions in a poultry house under controlled environmental conditions. After slaughtering, 20 carcasses for each group were randomly selected and used to conduct a triangle test (42 untrained panellists) and consumer test (54 untrained panellists) on both breast and leg meat. Triangle test evidenced that both breast and leg meat from free range birds had sensory properties (P<0.05) well recognizable in respect to control group. On the contrary, no significant general differences were observed in consumer test for tenderness, juiciness, flavour and overall acceptance, even if breast meat from free range rotisserie-type carcasses evidenced a greater acceptability. In conclusion, untrained panellists were able to recognize differences between free range and conventional chicken breast and leg meats, even if few variations in meat sensory traits were detected.
2012
XXIV Word's Poultry Congress
22
26
Sensory traits of meat from free range chickens / PETRACCI M.; RIMINI S.; FRANCHINI A.; CAVANI C.. - In: WORLD'S POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL. - ISSN 1743-4777. - ELETTRONICO. - 68:Suppl. 1(2012), pp. 22-26. (Intervento presentato al convegno World's Poultry Congress tenutosi a Salvador (Brazil) nel 5-9 August 2012).
PETRACCI M.; RIMINI S.; FRANCHINI A.; CAVANI C.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/133836
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact