1. Ecological restoration is gaining global momentum for climate mitigation, yetits prevailing approach, often rooted in Western technical science, frequentlyappears neutral while inadvertently reinforcing power imbalances and sidelininglocal knowledge.2. We argue for biocultural restoration approaches that go beyond communityparticipation by explicitly integrating cultural meanings, knowledge systems, andpower relations into restoration planning and governance. We frame restorationas an inherently socio-political act, rather than a neutral fix to a broken nature.3. The approach integrates three core principles and tools: political ecology, whichacknowledges and addresses unequal power dynamics influencing restoration;landscape biographies, offering a comprehensive historical understandingof human–nature interactions to inform restoration goals and prevent theperpetuation of injustices; and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), whichprovides invaluable local insights on ecosystem functioning and contributesto decolonising restoration practices while empowering local communities.Restoration researchers and practitioners must ensure that restoration effortstruly serve the diverse values and needs of local population

Melo, F., Lohbeck, M., Ferdous, R., Di Bonito, M., Gacheri, P., Mwangi, L., et al. (2026). On the need for biocultural approaches to restoration. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 8(8), 2598-2609 [10.1002/pan3.70362].

On the need for biocultural approaches to restoration

Di Bonito, Marcello
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2026

Abstract

1. Ecological restoration is gaining global momentum for climate mitigation, yetits prevailing approach, often rooted in Western technical science, frequentlyappears neutral while inadvertently reinforcing power imbalances and sidelininglocal knowledge.2. We argue for biocultural restoration approaches that go beyond communityparticipation by explicitly integrating cultural meanings, knowledge systems, andpower relations into restoration planning and governance. We frame restorationas an inherently socio-political act, rather than a neutral fix to a broken nature.3. The approach integrates three core principles and tools: political ecology, whichacknowledges and addresses unequal power dynamics influencing restoration;landscape biographies, offering a comprehensive historical understandingof human–nature interactions to inform restoration goals and prevent theperpetuation of injustices; and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), whichprovides invaluable local insights on ecosystem functioning and contributesto decolonising restoration practices while empowering local communities.Restoration researchers and practitioners must ensure that restoration effortstruly serve the diverse values and needs of local population
2026
Melo, F., Lohbeck, M., Ferdous, R., Di Bonito, M., Gacheri, P., Mwangi, L., et al. (2026). On the need for biocultural approaches to restoration. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 8(8), 2598-2609 [10.1002/pan3.70362].
Melo, Felipe; Lohbeck, Madelon; Ferdous, Raihana; Di Bonito, Marcello; Gacheri, Purity; Mwangi, Lukelysia; Magaju, Christine; Nankaya, Jedidah; Siddiq...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
People and Nature - 2026 - Melo - On the need for biocultural approaches to restoration.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 673.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
673.77 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1068872
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 1
social impact