Regulation CE 261/2004 applies to flights by non-Community carriers out of EU airspace even if flight 1 or 2 lands outside the EU. The necessary starting point here is that there is no requirement in Regulation 261 that they should land in the EU. Regulation 261 takes effect when the carrier is present in the EU and it imposes a contingent liability on the carrier at that point. The liability may never crystallise but if it does do so, it will crystallise outside the jurisdiction. It does not help Emirates to argue that the delay on flight 2 has to be caused by a delay on flight 1 within EU jurisdiction: that does not itself show that the territoriality principle has been contravened. On the compatibility between Regulation CE 261/2004 and Montreal Convention, it should be underlined that the Montreal Convention is not a pre-accession treaty to which Article 351 TFEU applies, it was ratified in by the UK in 2004, after the UK became a member of the EU. The UK entered into the Montreal Convention with the full knowledge of the EU and therefore no doubt with the intention that the UK should continue to perform certain obligations under it.

Giorgi, G. (2019). Il diritto del passeggero a una compensazione pecuniaria in caso di ritardo di un volo operato da un vettore non comunitario (Emirates). RIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO DEL TURISMO, 27, 459-478 [10.3280/DT2019-027006].

Il diritto del passeggero a una compensazione pecuniaria in caso di ritardo di un volo operato da un vettore non comunitario (Emirates)

Gloria Giorgi
2019

Abstract

Regulation CE 261/2004 applies to flights by non-Community carriers out of EU airspace even if flight 1 or 2 lands outside the EU. The necessary starting point here is that there is no requirement in Regulation 261 that they should land in the EU. Regulation 261 takes effect when the carrier is present in the EU and it imposes a contingent liability on the carrier at that point. The liability may never crystallise but if it does do so, it will crystallise outside the jurisdiction. It does not help Emirates to argue that the delay on flight 2 has to be caused by a delay on flight 1 within EU jurisdiction: that does not itself show that the territoriality principle has been contravened. On the compatibility between Regulation CE 261/2004 and Montreal Convention, it should be underlined that the Montreal Convention is not a pre-accession treaty to which Article 351 TFEU applies, it was ratified in by the UK in 2004, after the UK became a member of the EU. The UK entered into the Montreal Convention with the full knowledge of the EU and therefore no doubt with the intention that the UK should continue to perform certain obligations under it.
2019
Giorgi, G. (2019). Il diritto del passeggero a una compensazione pecuniaria in caso di ritardo di un volo operato da un vettore non comunitario (Emirates). RIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO DEL TURISMO, 27, 459-478 [10.3280/DT2019-027006].
Giorgi, Gloria
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1011029
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact